12.19.2007

The Heart of a Son

One of the greatest events of the Old Testament is the sacrifice of Isaac. God directed Abraham to sacrifice his only son; this was the trial of faith God sent Abraham to see if he really trusted and loved God. This time, Abraham passed this very difficult test. There are many parallels between Isaac and Jesus here.

Abraham had to walk for three days to get to the place of the sacrifice. In his mind, Isaac was as good as dead for those three days. “On the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes and saw the place afar off. Then Abraham said to his young men, ‘Stay here with the ass; I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again to you.’ And Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering, and laid it on Isaac his son; and he took in his hand the fire and the knife. So they went both of them together” (Genesis 22:4-6). Isaac carried the wood for the burnt offering; this is no task for a young boy for that is a decent amount of wood to be carried to a place “afar off.”

This carrying of the wood is fulfilled when Jesus takes up His cross to His sacrifice. Another similarity between the two is that Isaac’s sacrifice and Calvary where Jesus was sacrificed are both on Mount Moriah, so they both take place in the same general geographical location. Jesus and Isaac are both righteous first-born sons and only children who are sacrificed by their father. Both are tests of faith. Instead of Isaac actually being killed, there was a ram caught by its horns in a thorn bush, and this is a symbol of Jesus being crowned with thorns.

Jesus willingly offered Himself up to the Father. Did Isaac willingly offer himself? Abraham was 100 when Isaac was born, and now Isaac is at least a teenager which would make Abraham somewhere between 115 and 135 years old. If Isaac is strong enough to carry all that wood such a long distance, surely he is strong enough to escape from an elderly man. Since Abraham bound Isaac, doesn’t that mean Isaac was not a willing victim? Not necessarily. If Isaac could easily overpower his father, then he would want to be bound before he offered himself so that he would not escape when the time arrived. Out of fear Isaac could change his mind and escape from his father if he is not bound; he does not want to do escape; he wants to offer himself.

At the first, Isaac did not know that he was going to be the victim. He was walking with his father with the wood on his back, “and Isaac said to his father Abraham, ‘My father!’ And he said, ‘Here am I, my son.’ He said, ‘Behold, the fire and the wood; but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?’ Abraham said, ‘God will provide himself the lamb for a burnt offering, my son.’ So they went both of them together (Genesis 22:7-8). Isaac soon finds out that he is the sacrifice, that he is the lamb. Yet on another level, Abraham is prophesying about the Lamb of God that the Father will send—Jesus.

As Abraham was in the act of sacrificing his son, “the angel of the LORD called to him from heaven, and said, ‘Abraham, Abraham!’ And he said, ‘Here am I.’ He said, ‘Do not lay your hand on the lad or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, seeing you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me’” (Genesis 22:11-12). Abraham passes his ultimate test of faith for he believes God will raise Isaac even from the dead. Isaac, too, believes in God that God will resurrect his body so that he can go on to be the father of a multitude. For three days, Abraham considered his son to be dead, and on this third day, he re-gains his only son; this, of course, parallels Jesus’ three-day-old death which was followed by his resurrection.

Isaac is spared the knife, but a sacrifice still needs to take place. Abraham looked up and saw a ram with his horns entangled in a thorn bush. “Abraham went and took the ram, and offered it up as a burnt offering instead of his son. So Abraham called the name of that place The LORD will provide; as it is said to this day, ‘On the mount of the LORD it shall be provided’” (Genesis 22:13-14). Isaac was passed over, and God provided the sacrifice.

God is so pleased with Abraham and Isaac’s trusting hearts that He does something which is no where else recorded in Scripture. He swears by Himself and puts Himself under a curse. “By myself I have sworn, says the LORD, because you have done this, and have not withheld your son, your only son, I will indeed bless you, and I will multiply your descendants as the stars of heaven and as the sand which is on the seashore. And your descendants shall possess the gate of their enemies, and by your descendants shall all the nations of the earth bless themselves, because you have obeyed my voice” (Genesis 22: 16-18).

This is Israel’s life-insurance policy which saves them and brings them out of Egypt, keeps them alive after the Golden Calf, keeps them alive after the ten faithless spies don’t trust God to give them the Promised Land, keeps them alive with all their grumbling in the desert, keeps them alive when the second generation was about to go into the promised land and they sinned again with Baal of Peor. It is Abraham and Isaac’s faithfulness which keeps them going, for God has sworn to bless them and to have all the nations bless themselves by Abraham’s descendants.

This sacrifice brought down so many blessing upon the earth. It became Israel’s life-line, and it would be what called down God from heaven. Because God swore an oath to bless the nations through Abraham’s descendants, He was under a curse to make this happen. Jesus takes this curse upon Himself as Paul explains: “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us—for it is written, ‘Cursed be every one who hangs on a tree’—that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith” (Galatians 3:13-14). Paul is quoting Deuteronomy 21:23, and he sees the curse Christ took on for our sakes as the fulfillment of the oath sworn to Abraham. God became accursed so we could be blessed.

God tests us, and that testing is not only for our sakes and benefit. When we are faithful to God, in whatever capacity and to whatever degree, we bring blessings upon the earth. God does not save us against our will and in spite of ourselves; He wants us to cooperate with Him and to participate in our own and others’ redemption. Insofar as we imitate Abraham and Isaac and their unreserved and total gift of self, insofar as we lay down our life for our beloved like Jesus, this is the degree we are blessed by God and bring many blessing upon the world around us. World peace comes about through this type of self-sacrifice.

In baptism we receive adoption as sons, “and because you are sons, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying, ‘Abba! Father!’” (Galatians 4:6). These are the words of Isaac as he asked his father where the sacrificial lamb was that they were going to slay. Abraham tells him a bit later that Isaac himself is the lamb. Baptism makes us children of God who are willing to lay down our lives for others and to be faithful to God to the point of shedding our blood. The Eucharist is that pierced heart of Jesus on the cross that replaces our dead, stony heart so that we, too, can love with such a love and lay down our life in service to others in all that we do, both big and small.




Thanks for reading and your prayers.
Copyright 2007.
All rights reserved.

7 comments:

Tom Bengtson said...

Tony:

Is it possible that Abraham knew he would not have to sacrifice Isaac, since here he says "I and the Lad will come again to you." Cavins asked us to think about this in a class I took from him. What do you think? -- Tom B.

Anthony Biese said...

Abraham knew that Isaac, even if he were sacrificed, would not be dead for long because God had promised Abraham that Isaac would be the beginning of a vast number of descendants, and up till that point, Isaac had had no children. That is why Hebrews says, "He considered that God was able to raise men even from the dead” (Hebrews 11:9). He figured God would raise Isaac from the dead.
I think it is possible that Abraham might have wondered whether God was serious about his request to sacrifice Isaac, but I do not think it is that likely. From his dealings with God recorded in Genesis, Abraham knows God to be serious, have a sense of humor, and follow through with what He says. He has no previous experience with God playing games or changing His mind.
Abraham knows that he will come back with Isaac after the sacrifice because he trusts that God will be faithful to make Isaac the father of a multitude; thus, God will have to raise him from the dead. After God stops Abraham, He says that now He knows that Abraham is faithful; Abraham wasn't just playing or pretending; he was actually going to slay his son. Otherwise, God would not have considered Abraham to be faithful and obedient to His command.
I have no idea what Jeff Cavins (who I have a lot of respect for) said, but that is how I understand this episode.

Anonymous said...

Then what to make of Hebrews 11, specifically verses 17-19? It was by "faith" that Abraham offered up Isaac. Where there's knowledge, there is no faith. If Hebrews 11 is to have any meaning whatsoever, then Abraham could not have known that God would have spared Isaac.

Thoughts?

Caro Cardo Salutis

Anthony Biese said...

Abraham had faith in God's promise that through Isaac he would be father of a multitude of nations. His faith is in the content of that promise, and insofar that he believes God will send children through Isaac, Abraham is faithful. Abraham's test here is that this son of the promise is the one God asks him to sacrifice. Those seem like contradictory commands. Abraham believes that God will remain faithful to give him descendants through Isaac even though God has told him to sacrifice that son. God has a couple of options for being faithful to His promises: He could raise him from the dead or He could stop Abraham before he kills Isaac.
What did Abraham think? He told his servants that he and his son would come back to them, but all that indicates is that he believes God would be faithful to his original promise. We know that Abraham believed God would be faithful to His promise and give Abraham his son back to him alive after the test. We know that Abraham figured that God could raise Isaac from the dead; did Abraham also figure that God could stop him before he did the deed? As I said before, it is possible that Abraham might have considered that as a possibility. Abraham's faith does not concern what is going to happen to Isaac with the sacrifice, but his faith is that God will keep His promise that Isaac will be a father to a multitude of nations.

Anonymous said...

Tony, I don’t mean to be obstinate but it looks like you’ve made assumptions in your reading of Hebrews and, although you may be correct about them, I just don’t follow how you got there.

“God has a couple of options for being faithful to His promises: He could raise him from the dead or He could stop Abraham before he kills Isaac.” “We know that Abraham believed God would be faithful to His promise and give Abraham his son back to him alive after the test.”

God could have come up with additional choices for Himself. John the Baptist said that God could raise children of Abraham from stones. He could have let Abraham kill Isaac and have Isaac remain dead and yet still produce heirs. Why not? And couldn’t that scenario also be consistent with Abraham’s comment that he and the lad will return? Abraham could have meant that, after he kills his son, he will come back bringing with him his son’s dead body. I don’t read his telling his servants that he will return with Isaac, as showing Abraham’s faith that God will fulfill His original promise.

“Abraham's faith does not concern what is going to happen to Isaac with the sacrifice, but his faith is that God will keep His promise that Isaac will be a father to a multitude of nations.” Aren’t these two sides of the same coin? It seems to me that Abraham’s faith that “God will keep His promise that Isaac will be a father to a multitude of nations” definitely concerns “what is going to happen to Isaac with the sacrifice.” (Isaac IS the sacrifice, isn’t he?) I can’t imagine Abraham going through all the steps of killing his dear son and only concerning himself with the thought: “Now how is God going to make Isaac the father to a multitude of nations after I kill him?” and not with the thought “I’m about to kill my dear son, Isaac!”

Tom B./Jeff Cavin’s question is whether Abraham could have known that he wouldn’t go through with killing Isaac. Hebrews 11:17-19 doesn’t seem to make sense if you read it with the perspective of Abraham knowing he wouldn’t be going through with it.

[17] By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received the promises was ready to offer up his only son,
[18] of whom it was said, "Through Isaac shall your descendants be named."
[19] He considered that God was able to raise men even from the dead; hence, figuratively speaking, he did receive him back.

Although Abraham would have to have faith in God in order to believe that his son would be the father of a multitude of nations, that is separate and independent of the context of Isaac’s sacrifice. Paul makes note not of that aspect of Abraham’s faith, but specifically in light of Abraham sacrificing Isaac. I don’t think that would be noteworthy if Abraham knew he wouldn’t go through with it.

Thanks,
Caro Cardo Salutis

Anonymous said...

And Merry Christmas to you and your family.

Anthony Biese said...

CCS said, “Tom B./Jeff Cavin’s question is whether Abraham could have known that he wouldn’t go through with killing Isaac. Hebrews 11:17-19 doesn’t seem to make sense if you read it with the perspective of Abraham knowing he wouldn’t be going through with it.”

I agree, for I do not think that Abraham knew that he would not have to go through with it. He wouldn’t and couldn’t know that. I do think he could have thought that or wondered whether it was a possibility; although, I do not think it was that likely that he thought that.

CCS, you said, “God could have come up with additional choices for Himself. John the Baptist said that God could raise children of Abraham from stones. He could have let Abraham kill Isaac and have Isaac remain dead and yet still produce heirs. Why not?” Of course God could have done as you say, in a certain sense. Because God had said that it was through Isaac that Abraham’s descendants should come, for God to let Isaac die never to rise again would have been the breaking of His word. God, in that sense, had to make sure Isaac lived to father children.

It had to be Isaac and no one else to give Abraham descendants. Abraham’s fall was seeking a son on his own strength with Hagar. Abraham had Ishmael with her, but God told him to send Ishmael away. Genesis 21:8-12 says: “And the child grew, and was weaned; and Abraham made a great feast on the day that Isaac was weaned. But Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, playing with her son Isaac. So she said to Abraham, ‘Cast out this slave woman with her son; for the son of this slave woman shall not be heir with my son Isaac.’ And the thing was very displeasing to Abraham on account of his son. But God said to Abraham, ‘Be not displeased because of the lad and because of your slave woman; whatever Sarah says to you, do as she tells you, for through Isaac shall your descendants be named’.”

God promised Abraham a son, and that son was Isaac. He promised that it was this son who would give Abraham many descendants. Paul talks at length about the importance of it being Isaac who gives Abraham children: “For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave and one by a free woman. But the son of the slave was born according to the flesh, the son of the free woman through promise” (Galatians 4:22-23).

An enormous amount of the Abraham story revolves around this point of his two sons.
“But what does the scripture say? ‘Cast out the slave and her son; for the son of the slave shall not inherit with the son of the free woman.’ So, brethren, we are not children of the slave but of the free woman” (Galatians 4: 30). Everyone knows that Abraham had two sons, Ishmael and Isaac. Everyone seems to know that except God.

“He [God] said, ‘Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering upon one of the mountains of which I shall tell you’” (Genesis 22:2). In God’s eyes, Isaac is Abraham’s only son. He is the son God promised to give Abraham when he was seventy-five and then finally did give him when he was 100. Abraham slipped up when he was eighty-five fathering Ishmael, and it is because Abraham fails this test of waiting for God to provide him the promised son that Abraham needs to be tested once again. It is because Abraham has two sons, which indicates that he did not trust in God fully, that God has to re-test him by asking him to sacrifice his only remaining son. God could have certainly given Abraham descendants through Ishmael, and He did, but Ishmael was not considered to be his son. Isaac is the only way.

CCS, you also said, “Abraham could have meant that, after he kills his son, he will come back bringing with him his son’s dead body.” From the quote from Genesis in the previous paragraph, Isaac was going to be a burnt offering. Burnt offerings are entirely consumed by fire; that is why Isaac was carrying all the wood; the wood is needed to have a burnt offering.

I still only see two good options of what God could do here: raise Isaac from the dead (and even ash heap), or stop Abraham before he sacrifices his son. The letter to the Hebrews indicates that it was the former, so I would go with that. That still does not entirely rule out the possibility that it crossed Abraham’s mind that God would stop him beforehand. Abraham did have three days to think it all over. Either way, Abraham was prepared and ready and willing to offer up the son of the promise; and he did offer him up; God only stopped him at the last moment. Here Abraham passes the test, and God swears an oath to bless Abraham:

“By myself I have sworn, says the LORD, because you have done this, and have not withheld your son, your only son, I will indeed bless you, and I will multiply your descendants as the stars of heaven and as the sand which is on the seashore. And your descendants shall possess the gate of their enemies, and by your descendants shall all the nations of the earth bless themselves, because you have obeyed my voice” (Genesis 22:16-18). All the world will be blessed because of Abraham and Isaac’s faithfulness when Jesus comes to fulfill the self offering, when God provides the lamb.

Copyright 2007

Thanks for reading.